检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院城市发展与环境研究所 [2]中国社会科学院研究生院城市发展与环境系
出 处:《区域经济评论》2015年第1期146-152,共7页Regional Economic Review
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目"推进城镇化的重点难点问题研究"(14ZDA026);中国社会科学院创新工程项目"城镇化质量评估与提升路径研究"的支持
摘 要:基于"五位一体"总体布局思想构建的城市健康发展评价指标体系,可对全国287个地级及以上建制市的健康发展情况进行综合评价。评价结果显示,现阶段中国城市健康发展水平普遍较低,亚健康城市占比较高;城市健康发展的东强西弱格局显著,省域健康发展差距明显;大城市健康发展水平总体较高,但环境质量问题堪忧;相比经济发达城市,中等发达城市的健康发展表现出相对平衡的状态。中国城市健康发展的总体状况不容乐观,推动城市由亚健康向健康发展转型的任务艰巨。Based on the idea of promoting economic, social, cultural, ecological and management progress, this paperestablishes an evaluation index system on urban health development and makes a comprehensive evaluation of 287prefecture-level cities. The results point out four major features. Firstly, the level of health development in Chinese citiesis generally low and the proportion of sub-health cities is large. Secondly, cities in east area have higher healthdevelopment level, while the west area is just the opposite. What's more, the development gap among different provincesis obviously large. Thirdly, large cities enjoy better healthy development but their ecological quality is bad. At last, thehealthy development of medium-developed cities exhibits a relatively balanced state compared with the economicallydeveloped cities. In conclusion, the overall health development of Chinese cities is not optimistic; it is an urgent task topromote transition from sub-health to health development for all cities.
分 类 号:F061.5[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15