检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何松哲 何慧[1,2] 陈懿[1,2] 陈羽[3] 余道军[1,2]
机构地区:[1]浙江中医药大学附属杭州第一医院,浙江杭州310006 [2]杭州市第一人民医院,浙江杭州310006 [3]温州医科大学,浙江温州325035
出 处:《中国微生态学杂志》2015年第2期224-226,共3页Chinese Journal of Microecology
基 金:杭州市科技局社会发展科研计划资助项目(20130733Q04);杭州市卫生科技计划重大项目(2012ZD001)
摘 要:目的分析全血标本RNA提取的影响因素,并对全血RNA提取条件进行优化。方法收集100例全血标本,混匀后分为低渗红细胞溶解组(A组,50例)和全血直接提取组(B组,50例),利用Trizol试剂提取放置在不同温度、不同保存时间的全血标本总RNA,并采用Ur-2401紫外分光光度计测定其浓度和纯度;另选60例全血标本作为反复冻融组(C组),取不同次数反复冻融的全血标本利用Trizol法直接提取其RNA。结果 A组和B组新鲜标本中所获取的RNA浓度分别为450.0 ng/μL和458.8 ng/μL,37℃保存7 d标本中的RNA浓度分别为374.8 ng/μL和375.2 ng/μL,不同的保存温度与时间均对总RNA浓度(P=0.003、P=0.002)和纯度(P值均为0.011)的差异均有统计学意义,而相同条件下提取的总RNA浓度和纯度的差异无统计学意义(P=0.984、P=0.311);C组全血标本反复冻融的次数与保存时间对总RNA浓度(P=0.002、P=0.001)、纯度(P值均为0.008)差异均有统计学意义,而保存温度对总RNA浓度和纯度差异无统计学意义(P=0.611、P=0.362)。结论不同条件下全血标本中所获取的总RNA浓度有所差异,但在总RNA纯度和成功率方面,低渗破坏红细胞法优于直接全血提取法,反复冻融影响全血RNA提取效率和得率。Objective To explore the influencing factors in RNA extraction from blood samples and optimize the method of RNA isolation. Methods 160 blood samples were collected and divided into three groups: low permea- bility group ( group A, n = 50) , direct RNA extraction group ( group B, n = 50 ) and repeated freeze-thaw group ( group C, n = 60). Total RNA was extracted by Trizol reagent from the samples in group A and B stored in different temperatures and durations, and from the samples in group C with repeated freeze-thaw method. The concentration and purity were measured using Ur-2401 Ultraviolet Spectrophotometer. Results The concentrations of RNA from fresh samples of group A and B were 450. 0 ng/p.L and 458.8 ng/μL respectively; when the samples were stored at 37 ℃ for 7 days, the RNA concentrations were 374. 8 ng/μL and 375.2 ng/μL respectively. The preservation temperature and period had an impact on the total RNA concentration (P = 0. 003, P = 0. 002) and purity (P =0. 011, P =0. 011 ) in both group A and B with statistical significance, while the differences were not statistically significant in the concentration and purity (P = 0. 984 and P = 0. 311 ) of total RNA extracted under the same condition. In group C, both the repeated freeze-thaw cycles and preservation period had a statistically significant impact on total RNA concentration ( P = 0. 002 and P = 0. 001 ) and purity ( P = 0. 008 ), while the preservation temperature didn't (P = 0. 611 and P = 0. 362). Conclusion The total RNA concentrations are different when extracted under different conditions. In terms of purity and yield of RNA, the low permeability method is slightly bet- ter than direct RNA extraction from whole blood, and the repeated freeze-thaw method will affect the productivity of whole blood RNA extraction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145