检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尤杰[1]
机构地区:[1]上海大学影视艺术技术学院
出 处:《国际新闻界》2015年第2期6-17,共12页Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication
基 金:上海市高等教育内涵建设"085工程"子项目"影视媒体与都市文化建构"(编号:085SHOX09)中期研究成果~~
摘 要:数字盗版因其破坏了版权产业对其产品的流通控制及其非盈利性知识共享理念而被广泛认为具有颠覆资本主义文化生产与传播模式的反抗潜力。然而,数字盗版对全球音乐产业的转型推动以及中国电影(数字)盗版对好莱坞文化霸业的暗中助推却表明,世人应该从数字盗版的文化反抗幻象中清醒过来,应该从版权话语体系及其权力实践所支撑的消费主义空间中抽离出来.只有彻底地抛弃知识与文化私有产权概念而转向一种数字公地式的知识与文化生产和传播模式。It's widely assumed that digital piracy holds the potential of subverting the capitalist model of cultural production and distribution because it undermines the tight control of the circulation of intellectual products by the copyright industry and embodies a mentality of information communism. However, the facts that digital piracy of music has actually facilitated the institutional transformation of the global music industry and that (digital) piracy of movies in China's Mainland has served insidiously as an agent for Hollywood's ambition towards global cultural hegemony expose the illusionary nature of digital piracy's potential of cultural resistance, which in turn informs the necessity of distancing from the consumerist space maintained by the copyright system and its discursive practice of power. Only by totally abandoning the conception of private ownership in the arena of knowledge and cultural production and dissemination and turning to a model based on a conception of digital commons can the utopia of information freedom imagined by digital pirates obtain self-sustaining moral justification and practical feasibility.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.110.128