美国规制滥用知识产权行为保全的经验借鉴  

The Regulation Experience on Abuse of Intellectual Property Behavior Preservation in the USA

作　　者：刘晶[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北大学政法与公共管理学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2015年第3期97-100,共4页Intellectual Property

基　　金：2012年国家社会科学基金青年项目<刑事程序法的功能研究>(编号12CFX044)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：我国知识产权行为保全的制度设计存在漏洞,比如实体审查标准过低、被申请人缺乏程序参与权、担保数额仅限于填平直接损失,以及被申请人对错误保全缺乏救济能力等,这些漏洞易滋生申请人的权利滥用现象。美国禁令适用的正当程序原则、衡平原则以及错误禁令的惩罚性赔偿机制为我国规制知识产权权利滥用提供了有益借鉴。我国在知识产权行为保全的法律制度中应当增加利益衡平、正当程序原则以及惩罚性赔偿机制来制约权利滥用。The system design of intellectual property behavior preservation tends to breed right abuse in China, because there exists some legal loopholes such as low substance review criteria, lacking of defendants＇ participation right, inadequate amount of security which only can be compensated direct losses and lacking of relief ability of defendants facing improper preservation. American＇s practice provides us some reference such as the principle of due process and equitable principles in application of prohibition, punitive damages mechanism improper prohibition. In order to avoid abuse of behavior preservation in our intellectual property system, it is suggested to introduce the principle of interest equilibrium and due process and punitive damages mechanism.

关 键 词：知识产权 行为保全 权利滥用 法律规制 

分 类 号：D971.2[政治法律—法学] DD913