关于子宫楔形切除术与传统子宫切除术术后患者生活质量的对比探究  

作　　者：朱晓燕 

机构地区：[1]五通桥区人民医院,四川乐山641800

出　　处：《现代妇女（医学前沿）》2015年第1期I0004-I0005,共2页Modern Women

摘　　要：目的对采用子宫楔形切除术和传统子宫切除术患者的术后生活质量进行观察比较。方法以在我院行子宫切除术的120例患者为研究对象，随机等分为两组，对照组采用传统腹式全子宫切除术，观察组采用小开腹子宫体楔形切除术。观察对比两组术后6个月时心理健康水平、痛经缓解程度、更年期症状及性生活质量。结果观察组患者身心健康情况优于对照组（P〈0．05），更年期症状少于对照组（P〈0．05），性生活质量高于对照组（P〈0．05），具有统计学意义。观察组痛经缓解评分为4．68±0．25，对照组4．51±0．42，无显著差异（P〉0．05）。结论需行子宫切除术的患者采用小开腹下子宫楔形切除术，术后生活质量负面影响较小，值得临床推广。Objective： To observe the quality of life with uterine wedge resection and traditional hysterectomy patients after operation. Methods： in 120 cases in our hospital for a hysterectomy patients as the research object, randomly divided into two groups, the control group used the traditional abdominal hysterectomy, the observation group USES the small open uterine body wedge resection, two groups were observed and compared after 6 months of physical and mental health, relieve the symptoms of dysmenorrhea quality and the degree of sexual life, menopause. Results： The observation group patients physical and mental health situation better than the control group （P 〈 0.05）, the symptoms of menopause is shorter than that of control group （P 〈 0.05）, the quality of life is higher than that of control group （P 〈 0.05）, with statistical significance. The observation group mitigation dysmenorrhea score was 4.68 ± 0.25, 4.51 ±0.42 in the control group, no significant difference （P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion： Line to hysterectomy patients with small open wedge resection of the uterus, postoperative life quality less negative effect, worth clinical promotion.

关 键 词：子宫疾病 腹式全子宫切除术 小开腹子宫楔形切除术 

分 类 号：C913.4[经济管理]