检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李伟斌[1,2] 吴家兵[1] 王安志[1] 关德新[1] 金昌杰[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所森林与土壤生态国家重点实验室,沈阳110164 [2]中国科学院大学,北京100049
出 处:《应用生态学报》2015年第2期497-504,共8页Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31370614;41371064)资助
摘 要:利用中国科学院长白山森林生态系统定位站的近地面气象观测数据,分析评价了目前被广泛使用的8个晴天与8个云天大气长波辐射参数化模型的模拟性能.结果表明:晴天时Satterlund模型最适用,其偏差(BIAS)与均方根误差(RMSE)分别是-23.34和28.55W·m-2;系数校正后,虽然其参数值变化不大,但其模拟效果有很大提高,BIAS与RMSE分别降低为-6.33和18.08 W·m-2;云天时Jacobs模型最准确,BIAS和RMSE只有0.38和29.29W·m-2.对模型中大气发射率的敏感性分析表明,大气发射率对水汽压的变化最敏感,对温度的变化不敏感.应用优选模型(晴天和云天)得到的模拟值与观测值的日变化趋势基本一致,但在云量发生突变的节点上模拟效果不太理想.A total of eight clear-sky and eight cloudy-sky parameterized models for estimating day- time downward longwave radiation were evaluated by using the meteorological data measured in the Changbai Mountains region, Northeast China. The results indicated that the.Satterlund model per- formed better in estimating clear-sky downward longwave radiation, and the bias (BIAS) and root mean square error (RMSE) were -23.34 and 28.55 W · m-2, respectively. Although the coeffi- cients were not significantly changed, the performance of Satterlund model was significantly im- proved after the locally calibrated, and the BIAS and RMSE decreased to -6.33 and 18.08 W · m-2, respectively. Jacobs model was found to be best for modeling cloudy-sky downward long- wave radiation and the BIAS and RMSE were 0.38 and 29.29 W · m-2, respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that the vapor pressure was the most sensitive variable to the atmospheric emissivity and the temperature was not sensitive to it. The predicted results of the optimal model (clear- and cloudy-sky) were consistent with the measured data, while the performance of these models was affected by a sudden change of cloudy cover.
分 类 号:P422[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222