美国联邦巡回上诉法院特色机制及对我国的借鉴  

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: The Mechanism and Reference to China

作　　者：蔡元臻 

机构地区：[1]北京大学国际知识产权研究中心 [2]北京大学法学院

出　　处：《科技与法律》2015年第1期90-106,共17页Science Technology and Law

基　　金：北京市社会科学基金项目"北京知识产权法院建设研究"(项目编号:15ZDA05)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：设立知识产权专门法院以审理知识产权案件的做法是当今国际主流,然而我国自拥有知识产权制度以来,便始终处于面向"三审合一"模式的缓慢衍进之中。我国知识产权专门法院体系随着《关于在北京、上海、广州设立知识产权法院的决定》的施行虽有渐成之势,但是仍未能触及设立全国性知识产权法院的问题。鉴于中美两国知识产权环境的相似性以及密切的贸易关系,我国在知识产权法院的创设问题上可以借鉴"美国模式"的经验。了解围绕联邦巡回上诉法院而建立的美国诉讼体系,对解决我国所面临的"司法与行政双轨制""循环诉讼"以及知识产权法官选任等问题具有相当价值。The establishment of IP courts specifically for IP trials is nowadays the mainstream practice, yet China, since having its own IP regime, is in between the laggard progress towards the ‘tri-trial' mode. The Chinese IP court system, following the implementation of Decision on the Establishment of Intellectual Property Courts in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, is expecting a gradual formation, whereas the question of establishing a nationwide IP court remains unvisited. The similarity of the IP environment as well as the close trade affiliations between China and the U.S. dictate that the U.S. system shall be an important reference to the creation of Chinese IP courts. Also, dealing with judicature-oriented problems such as ‘judicatureadministration dual-track' ‘circulating lawsuits' and IP judge selection in China can receive substantial experiences from understanding the U.S. litigation system established based on the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

关 键 词：知识产权法院 联邦巡回上诉法院 知识产权法官选任 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]