从竞争优势分析工资集体谈判/协商的目标及路径——基于中欧的对比研究  

Objectives and Paths of Wage Collective Bargaining under the Analysis of Competitive Advantages:Based on Comparative Research of China and Europe

作　　者：李敏[1] 黄秦[1] 郑英隆[2] 

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学工商管理学院 [2]暨南大学产业经济研究院

出　　处：《中国人力资源开发》2015年第5期82-89,共8页Human Resources Development of China

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(12&ZD095);广东省教育厅人文社会科学研究重大攻关项目(N911039a);广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(GD13CGL15)的研究成果

摘　　要：中国传统制造业的竞争优势在于其劳动力成本优势,近年频发的集体劳动争议,使得这种竞争优势逐渐减弱。本文对比分析了中国集体劳动争议处理体系目标和欧盟工资集体谈判的目标差异,以及中国集体劳动争议处理路径之一的工资集体谈判/协商制度的特点。得出的分析结论是:由于忽视可持续性增长的国际竞争优势为中国集体劳动争议处理的最终目标,导致农民工的工资增长处于无序状态,伤及国家、行业、以及企业的国际竞争力,也伤及农民工收入增长的秩序。论文最后针对对比分析的结果,提出了今后完善工资集体谈判/协商制度的思路建议。China＇s competitive advantage of traditional manufacture depends on China huge cheap labor force. In recent years,this competitive advantage is weakening because of the frequent collective labor disputes which induce the labor cost increasing significantly. This paper not only comparative analyzes the different objectives in solving collective labor disputes between China and EU,but also the characteristics of the solving paths for wage collective bargaining between China and EU. The research concludes that the wage growth of migrant workers is disorder due to the ignore of the sustainability growth of the international competitive advantage as the ultimate objective in dealing with the Chinese collective labor disputes. This ignore hurts the international competitiveness of both the nation and industry,and also hurts the income growth of the migrant workers. Finally,the comments of how to improve the wage collective bargaining are discussed.

关 键 词：集体劳动争议 工资集体协商 竞争优势 人工成本 

分 类 号：D922.5[政治法律—民商法学] F249.24[政治法律—法学]