检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大冶有色金属集团控股有限公司,湖北黄石435005
出 处:《矿冶工程》2015年第1期57-60,共4页Mining and Metallurgical Engineering
摘 要:系统研究了某高硫铁矿降低铁精矿中硫含量的选别工艺。根据降硫工艺的先后顺序,采用先磁选再降硫和先降硫再磁选两种工艺流程。先磁选后降硫工艺,采用再磨磁选和浮选两种方法降硫,再磨磁选降硫工艺得到铁精矿品位67.08%(含硫0.14%),回收率91.91%;浮选降硫工艺得到铁精矿品位64.90%(含硫0.13%),回收率91.90%。先降硫后磁选工艺得到铁精矿品位63.19%(含硫0.13%),回收率88.43%。推荐先磁选后降硫工艺。Beneficiation technology of a high-sulfur iron ore has been systematically studied in order to reduce the sulfur content in iron concentrates. Two flowsheets,magnetic separation-sulfur reduction( MS-SR) and sulfur reductionmagnetic separation( SR-MS),were adopted. Regrinding-magnetic separation and flotation process were introduced respectively in MS-SR flowsheet for sulfur reduction. The TFe grade and recovery for iron concentrate obtained by regrinding-magnetic separation were 67. 08%( with sulfur content of 0. 14%) and 91. 91%,respectively,while the corresponding indicators for concentrate obtained by flotation were 64. 90%( with sulfur content of 0. 13%) and 91.90%. For SR-MS flowsheet,the iron grade and recovery of iron concentrate were 63. 19%( with sulfur content of 0.13%) and 88. 43%,respectively. MS-SR approach is recommended for its superior performance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249