因特网条约权利管理信息条款研究——兼论我国《著作权法》第三次修改  

Interpretation of Right Management Information Provisions In WIPO Internet Treaties

作　　者：湛茜[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学法律系,上海200241

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第2期67-83,163-164,共17页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目<国际贸易中的数字知识产权执法研究>(批准号:13BFX156)

摘　　要：随着信息网络技术的不断发展,数字环境下的知识产权保护和执法逐渐成为一项重要的课题。1996年世界知识产权组织因特网条约对权利管理信息保护进行了专门规定,首次在国际法层面上要求各成员国对于权利管理信息提供适当和有效的法律救济。由于因特网条约仅提供了一个保护权利管理信息的基本框架,各成员国在很大程度上可以自由决定如何履行其国际法义务。比较各国履行因特网条约权利管理保护条款的国内立法,主要差异体现在权利管理信息定义、禁止行为、主观认知要求、例外限制情形以及法律救济方式五个方面。我国《著作权法第三次修改草案》在现行立法的基础上对权利管理信息提供了较为详尽合理的规定,但仍然存在一定不足有待明确。As the rapid development of information technology, intellectual property protection and enforcement in digital environment gradually became an important issue. WIPO Internet Treaties include new provisions for the digital intellectual property protection since 1996,which require all the members to provide adequate and effective legal remedies for the right management information. WIPO Internet Treaties only afford basic framework,leaving much discretion for members to decide how to implement their treaty obligations. The domestic legislations which aim to implement provisions of WIPO Internet Treaties concerning protection of right management information,mainly vary in five aspects: definition of right management information,acts to be sanctioned,knowledge requirement,limitations or exceptions of liabilities,and forms of legal remedies. The Draft for the 3rd revision of China Copyright Law promulgates more detailed and reasonable provisions on the protection of right management information. However,it still has some inherent flaws which need further clarification.

关 键 词：权利管理信息 因特网条约 《著作权法》第三次修改 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]