检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢光明[1] 范贞 韩学军 张云林 范军亮 卢光泽[1] 吴雯[1] 王忠新[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军总医院健康管理研究院,北京100853 [2]北京市卫生法学会,北京100053 [3]山西省医疗纠纷人民调解委员会,山西太原030012 [4]衡水市医疗纠纷人民调解委员会,河北衡水053000
出 处:《中国医院管理》2015年第3期44-46,共3页Chinese Hospital Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金(面上)资助项目(71173231);北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(11FXB009)
摘 要:为有效化解医疗纠纷,解决对医疗责任的赔偿问题,我国近10年来相继在部分省市实施了医疗责任保险,但各地现有的医疗责任保险均难以展开,寻求一种新的医疗责任风险分担模式尤为迫切。文章试图用理论和实际相结合的方法,在确立我国医疗责任公益信托的基本理论框架体系的基础上,探讨我国实施医疗责任公益信托模式的可行性,对解决我国医疗责任保险的商业性与医疗纠纷解决公益性之间的矛盾、加快医疗纠纷的有效解决、促进医患和谐有着重要的意义。For the effective dissolving of medical disputes and the settlements of medical injury patients compensations, medical liability insurance has been implemented in several provinces of China in succession in the past 10 years. But the present mode for medical liabilities across the country is inadequate, and it is urgent to explore new medical risk-sharing mode. Through combining methods of theoretic researches with the reality, and based on a basic theoretic framework of charitable trust for the medical liabilities, the feasibility analysis of charitable trust mode for medical liabilities is explored. The present study has important implications for dissolving the contradictions of commercialism of medical liability insurances versus charitable trust of medical dispute resolution, accelerating the effective settlements of medical disputes and promoting the patient-doctor harmony.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.118