导管头皮针与钢针头皮针临床效果对比研究  

A comparative study on clinical effects of the catheter needle and steed needle

作　　者：刘青焱[1] 阳艾玲[2] 汪贵宇 刘兴铃 葛方群 张琳[4] 刘珉甬[3] 

机构地区：[1]泸州医学院附属医院手术室,四川泸州646000 [2]泸州医学院附属医院医学实验中心,四川泸州646000 [3]泸州医学院附属医院护理医疗器械研发实验室,四川泸州646000 [4]泸州医学院护附属医院理医疗器械研发实验室,四川泸州646000

出　　处：《泸州医学院学报》2015年第1期82-84,共3页Journal of Luzhou Medical College

基　　金：泸州市科技局项目(2013LZLY-K62)

摘　　要：目的:通过一次性使用导管头皮针与钢针头皮针临床效果对比研究,找出其差异性,为导管头皮针推广应用提出客观依据。方法:将临床80例患者随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组采用一次性使用导管头皮针输液,对照组采用一次性使用钢针头皮针输液。观察两组输液过程中刺破血管率、液体渗漏率、活动受限情况。结果:输液过程中刺破血管率实验组为0,对照组为22.5%;液体渗漏率实验组为0,对照组为22.5%;活动受限率实验组为0,对照组为100%,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:一次性使用导管头皮针在输液过程中能降低刺破血管率和液体渗漏率,活动不受限,临床效果优于钢针头皮针,值得推广。Objective： To find out the differences between needle and catheter needle and steel needle by comparing their clinical effects and provide a scientific basis for the popularization and application of indwelling catheter needle. Methods： 80 patients were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group was transfused by using catheter needle and the control group steel needle. The rate of piercing vascular, rate of liquid leakage and the activity limitation of the patients were tested in the two groups. Results： The rates of piercing vascular and liquid leakage were both 0 in the experimental group and 22.5% in the control group; the rate of activities limitation during the transfusion was 0 in the experimental group and 100% in the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion： The rate of piercing vascular and liquid leakage could be reduced, and the activity of the patients would not be limited by using catheter needle instead of the steed needle. The catheter needle is worthy of popularization and application.

关 键 词：导管头皮针 钢针头皮针 刺破血管 液体渗漏 活动受限 

分 类 号：R619.9[医药卫生—外科学]