论商标评审委员会和专利复审委员会法律地位的再设计  被引量:1

Redesigning the Legal Status of Both the Trademark Review & Adjudication Board and the Patent Reexamination Board

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:刘明江[1] 

机构地区:[1]河南牧业经济学院,郑州450008

出  处:《中州大学学报》2015年第1期32-35,共4页Journal of Zhongzhou University

基  金:教育部人文社会科学研究项目"商标使用类型化研究"(11YJA820106)

摘  要:在现行的商标法和专利法中,商标评审委员会和专利复审委员会的身份是国家行政机构,因此带来了诸如循环诉讼、马拉松诉讼和诉累的困惑。时值北京知识产权法院设立之际,重新设计商标评审委员会和专利复审委员会的法律地位,将其定位为准司法机构。为了使商标评审委员会和专利复审委员会的准司法机构地位落到实处,还需要进行配套的改革,赋予法院对商标权和专利权效力裁决权,恰当区分民事诉讼和行政诉讼。In the current trademark law and patent law,both the Trademark Review Adjudication Board and the Patent Reexamination Board are designed to be administrative state organs,resulting in such issues as cyclic litigation,marathon litigation and litigation exhaustion. Along with the establishment of Beijing Intellectual Property Court,it is suggested that the Trademark Review Adjudication Board and the Patent Reexamination Board be redesigned to be quasi-judicial agencies in legal status. To this end,it is also suggested that supportive reformation measures be taken,including giving the court the right to adjudicate on trademark and patent validity and making a right division between civil lawsuits and administrative lawsuits.

关 键 词:商标评审委员会 专利复审委员会 法律地位 北京知识产权法院 

分 类 号:D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象