检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘明江[1]
机构地区:[1]河南牧业经济学院,郑州450008
出 处:《中州大学学报》2015年第1期32-35,共4页Journal of Zhongzhou University
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究项目"商标使用类型化研究"(11YJA820106)
摘 要:在现行的商标法和专利法中,商标评审委员会和专利复审委员会的身份是国家行政机构,因此带来了诸如循环诉讼、马拉松诉讼和诉累的困惑。时值北京知识产权法院设立之际,重新设计商标评审委员会和专利复审委员会的法律地位,将其定位为准司法机构。为了使商标评审委员会和专利复审委员会的准司法机构地位落到实处,还需要进行配套的改革,赋予法院对商标权和专利权效力裁决权,恰当区分民事诉讼和行政诉讼。In the current trademark law and patent law,both the Trademark Review Adjudication Board and the Patent Reexamination Board are designed to be administrative state organs,resulting in such issues as cyclic litigation,marathon litigation and litigation exhaustion. Along with the establishment of Beijing Intellectual Property Court,it is suggested that the Trademark Review Adjudication Board and the Patent Reexamination Board be redesigned to be quasi-judicial agencies in legal status. To this end,it is also suggested that supportive reformation measures be taken,including giving the court the right to adjudicate on trademark and patent validity and making a right division between civil lawsuits and administrative lawsuits.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.80.203