低碳消费与低碳消费行为的差异性及对政策干预设计的影响  

The Differences Between Low-Carbon Consumption and Low Carbon Consumption Behavior and Its Influence on the Policy Design

作　　者：崔风暴[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]同济大学经济与管理学院,上海200092 [2]宜宾学院经济与管理学院,四川宜宾644007

出　　处：《宜宾学院学报》2015年第2期47-54,共8页Journal of Yibin University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目"低碳政策体系优化及演进路径研究"(12XJY014)

摘　　要：目前我国关于低碳政策设计框中,生产和消费两个领域低碳政策群之间缺乏经济逻辑,低碳没有成为经济有效运行的推动力,没有产生预期中的经济效益。低碳消费理论的逻辑起点模糊了低碳消费和低碳消费行为的概念内涵,导致低碳消费政策机制碎片化;混淆宏、微观低碳消费政策的设计目标,将低碳消费行为作为宏观政策的作用客体,将微观政策干预机制混淆进宏观政策的干预机制;导致政策目标设计过于放大减排动机,而忽略经济效率动机。In China＇ s current low-carbon policy system, economic logic has been weakened between the production and consumption so that low-carbon hasn＇ t become the driving force of healthy economic develop- ment, and hasn＇ t yielded returns as expected. The present low-carbon consumption theory confused the con- cept distinction between low-carbon consumption and low carbon consumption behavior, which made the pol- icy mechanism fragmented; the confusion of the goals led to an overemphasis on the emission reduction and and intervention mechanism of macro and micro policy an underempahsis on the economic efficiency.

关 键 词：低碳消费 低碳消费行为 政策设计 

分 类 号：F014.5[经济管理—政治经济学]