检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:商庆银[1] 杨秀霞[1] 成臣 罗亢 黄山[1] 石庆华[1] 潘晓华[1] 曾勇军[1]
机构地区:[1]江西农业大学双季稻现代化生产协同创新中心/作物生理生态与遗传育种教育部重点实验室/江西省作物生理生态与遗传育种重点实验室,南昌330045
出 处:《中国水稻科学》2015年第2期181-190,共10页Chinese Journal of Rice Science
基 金:国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2012BAD14B14);江西省教育厅青年科学基金资助项目(GJJ14306);江西省高等学校科技落地计划资助项目(12063);江西省科技计划资助项目(20132BAB214021);江西省博士后科研资助项目
摘 要:以南方红壤区双季稻-紫云英为研究对象,利用静态箱-气相色谱法分别分析包括绿肥和稻草等秸秆还田条件下不同水分管理对稻田CH4和N2O排放、水稻产量以及综合温室效应(GWP)的影响。试验设持续淹水(F)、中期烤田(F-D-F)和间歇灌溉(F-D-F-M)处理。结果表明,秸秆还田条件下双季稻田周年CH4排放量介于208.3kg/hm2(F-D-F-M处理)和678.2kg/hm2(F处理)之间,其中,晚稻生长季占周年CH4排放量的60.6%~71.7%。F处理周年CH4排放量显著高于F-D-F和F-D-F-M处理(P〈0.05)。秸秆还田条件下双季稻田周年N2O排放量为4.75~8.19kg/hm2。与F处理相比,F-D-F-M处理周年N2O排放通量显著增加(60.9%);而F和F-D-F处理之间没有显著差异。早稻和晚稻各处理产量分别为7.76~8.02t/hm2和7.22~8.69t/hm2。秸秆还田条件下,双季稻单位面积GWP和单位产量GWP分别为7648.8~18471.8kg/hm2和0.48~1.12 kg/kg,其中F-D-F和F-D-F-M处理分别显著低于F处理(P〈0.05)。因此,在秸秆还田条件下采用中期烤田和间歇灌溉替代持续淹水,可以同步实现双季稻高产和减轻农业生产对气候的潜在影响。This study provided an insight into a complete green house gases(GHG)accounting of global warming potential(GWP)as affected by water regime in typical double rice-cropping system with crop residue returning.The three water treatments included continuous flooding(F),flooding-midseason drainage-reflooding(F-D-F)and floodingmidseason drainage-reflooding-moist intermittent irrigation(F-D-F-M)in rice growing seasons.Methane and N2O fluxes were measured using static chamber method.The results showed that annual CH4 emissions ranged from 208.3kg/hm2 for the F-D-F-M plots to 678.2kg/hm2 for the F plots,being 60.6%-71.7%from late-rice season.The CH4 emission was significantly reduced by midseason drainage and intermittent irrigation in comparison with continuous flooding.Annual N2O emission was 4.75-8.19kg/hm2 in the double rice-cropping system.Compared with the F plots,the N2O emission slightly reduced in the F-D-F plots,while it was remarkably increased in the F-D-F-M plots.Among treatments,the grain yields of early-rice and late-rice were 7.76-8.02t/hm2 and 7.22-8.69t/hm2,respectively.The GWP ranged from 7648.8kg/hm2 for the F-D-F-M plots to 18471.8kg/hm2 for the F plots in double ricecropping system with crop residue returning.The GWP ranged from 0.48kg/kg to 1.12kg/kg,significantly reduced for the F-D-F and F-D-F-M plots as compared to F plots.Therefore,agricultural economic viability and GHGs mitigation can be simultaneously achieved by midseason drainage and intermittent irrigation instead of continuous waterlogging in the double rice-cropping system with crop residue returing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13