检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江警察学院,浙江杭州310053 [2]宁波市北仑区人民检察院,浙江宁波315800
出 处:《行政与法》2014年第12期21-25,共5页Administration and Law
摘 要:澳门病态赌博日趋严重与救助立法缺失现状之间的矛盾由来已久。澳门病态赌博救助法制化的必要性缘自澳门当下特殊的管制环境与病态赌博救助所牵涉利益的复杂性。为了尽快实现病态赌博救助法制化,应将理论着力点放置于救助法的内容(规制手段)与形式(法律位阶)两个方面。鉴于"病态赌徒"具有双重认定标准,澳门病态赌博救助法制化目前仍是一个极具挑战性的前沿课题。It is a long-standing contradiction of pathological gambling in Macao and the lack of its salvation legislation.The necessity of the salvation legislation of pathological gambling in Macao is for the current special control environment in Macao and the complexity of the interests involved in the salvation of pathological gambling.In order to realize the salvation legislation of pathological gambling as soon as possible,we should pay more theoretical attention to two aspects:the content of the act of salvation(the regulation means) and its form(legal hierarchy).In view of the double defining standard of "pathological gambler",the salvation legislation of pathological gambling in Macao is still a challenging frontier.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3