存在还是不存在:世界文学史的中国主体性建构  

To Be or Not to Be: The Chinese Subjectivity in World Literature History

作　　者：王晓燕[1] 方汉文[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国传媒大学文学院,北京100024 [2]苏州大学文学院,江苏苏州215123

出　　处：《苏州教育学院学报》2014年第6期47-52,共6页Journal of Suzhou College of Education

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金重点项目(12AZD090);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(12YJA751011)

摘　　要：中国的世界文学史新建构中,应当改变以前将中国本土文学排除在外的模式。根据国际世界文学史的书写经验,将本土文学作为世界文学史的构成,可以使中国文学具有世界性的视域,更为重要的是这样可以建立中国的主体性话语。只有通过主体性话语的对话,发出中国的"声腔",中国才能真正进入世界文学史。世界文学史应当是多元主体话语、"多声腔"的体系,从"理一分殊"的辩证理性观念来看,世界文学的整体性表现为一种"理一",而中国文学的主体性话语则是"分殊",从分殊到理一,推动多元化的世界文学体系建构。The tradition of expelling native Chinese literature should no longer be observed in the new construction of world literature history in China. The international compiling experience of world literature history suggests that treating native literature as its component will bring world perspective and more importantly Chinese subjective discourse to her literature. Only the utterance of sinophony in the dialogue of subjective discourse can signify China’s real entry into the world literature history, which should be a multi-subjective discourse, consists of multi-phones. In terms of the dialectical rationalism of “The Principle is One, its Implementation is Divided into Multiplicity”, the totality of world literature could be considered as“the One Principle”, while the subjective discourse of Chinese Literature as“Multiplicity”, the evolution from the latter to the former propels the construction of the diversiifed world literature system.

关 键 词：世界文学史 中国话语 主体性 

分 类 号：I109[文学—世界文学]