检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨圆[1,2] 杨建平[3] 李曼[1,2] 谭春萍[3,2] 王生霞[1] 王世金[3]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所内陆河流域生态水文重点实验室,甘肃兰州730000 [2]中国科学院大学,北京100049 [3]中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所冰冻圈科学国家重点实验室,甘肃兰州730000
出 处:《冰川冻土》2015年第1期70-79,共10页Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology
基 金:国家重大科学研究计划项目(2013CBA01808);国家自然科学基金项目(41271088);国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(41121001)资助
摘 要:以河西地区三大内陆河流域(石羊河、黑河、疏勒河)为案例研究区,通过社会调查方式,从总体、再分别通过农户与政府部门人员两个部分,分析了公众对冰川变化及其可能影响的感知,剖析了公众感知的流域差异性与原因,对比分析了三大河流域公众对政府部门已实施应对水资源紧缺对策措施的效果与认可程度.结果表明:超过65%的受访者认为冰川减少了,从社会学的角度佐证了冰川明显消融萎缩的科学监测事实.三大河流域公众对冰川变化对流域水资源、农业生产、生态影响的感知存在空间差异性,这种差异性归因于三大河流域的地理位置、冰川分布与变化的空间差异性.在冰川变化背景下,公众对政府部门已实施应对水资源紧缺的对策措施的效果与接受程度不同.三大河流域公众均认可种植业结构调整与加大宣传力度提高公众节水意识这两项措施,且认为实施效果好;发展设施农业措施的实施效果好,已得到石羊河和疏勒河流域老百姓的认可与接受;石羊河和黑河流域的公众认为实施推广节水技术措施的效果好;退耕还林还草措施在黑河流域实施普遍且效果好;水票制措施在疏勒河流域实施的最好,黑河一般,疏勒河较差.Three sub-basins( Shiyanghe,Heihe and Shulehe River basins) of the Hexi inland river basin were chosen as study areas in this paper. The public perceptions on glacier changes and its possible influences were analyzed through the ways of questionnaire survey and face-to-face interviews from two aspects,farmers and governmental officials. The discrepancies and reasons of the public perceptions among the three basins were also revealed. The implementing effect and the degree of recognition of the public on adaptive measures against water resources shortage,which are implemented by local government,are analyzed comparatively. The results showthat more than 65% of respondents believe that the local glaciers are apparently shrinking. The scientific viewof glacier shrinkage is nowevidenced in the viewof sociology. Spatial differences of the public perceptions on the water resources, agricultural production and ecological impact are found in the three basins, which were attributed to geographical location,glacial distribution and spatial heterogeneity of glacier change. There are differences among the public perceptions on the implementing effects and recognition degree of some countermeasures in the three basins. Cropping structure adjustment and water-saving measures are considered feasible and good in the three basins. The facility agriculture measure has been accepted by the public in the Shiyanghe River and Shulehe River basins. Farmers have considered that water-saving technology is good for them in the Shiyanghe River and Heihe River basins. The grain for green is implementing universally and has a positive effect. The implementation effect of water-ticket system is considered best in the Shulehe River basin,followed by the Heihe River basin.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.189.148