检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:强斌[1] 刘海军[1] 张海梅[1] 任岩岩[1] 荆晶[1] 张晓鸥[1]
机构地区:[1]中国空空导弹研究院洛阳二〇二医院麻醉科,洛阳471003
出 处:《航空航天医学杂志》2015年第3期295-297,共3页Journal of Aerospace medicine
摘 要:目的观察舒芬太尼联合丙泊酚用于无痛纤维胃镜检查术的麻醉效果以及安全性。方法选择50例ASAⅠ-Ⅱ级行无痛纤维胃镜检查术患者,随机平均分为Ⅰ组(舒芬太尼+丙泊酚)和Ⅱ组(单用丙泊酚)每组25例。Ⅰ组静脉滴注舒芬太尼5μg,2 min后静脉注射1.5 mg/kg丙泊酚;Ⅱ组单独静脉注射2.5 mg/kg丙泊酚;两组患者必要时每次追加丙泊酚0.2-0.3 mg/kg;比较两组麻醉镇痛效果与安全性;记录两组患者给药前(T0)、给药后2 min(T1)、过咽喉部(T2)和苏醒时(T3)HR、RR、SBP、Sp O2的变化;记录麻醉起效时间,苏醒时间和离院时间;麻醉后不良反应情况。结果Ⅰ组麻醉效果优于Ⅱ组(P〈0.05)T1时两组HR慢于、SBP及Sp O2均明显低于T0时(P〈0.05)。T1、T2、T3时Ⅱ组HR慢于、SBP低于Ⅰ组(P〈0.05)。Ⅱ组过咽喉部时呛咳明显高于Ⅰ组(P〈0.05)。Ⅱ组起效、苏醒、离院时间均长于Ⅰ组(P〈0.05)。Ⅱ组丙泊酚用量明显高于Ⅰ组(P〈0.05)。术中舌后坠、呼吸抑制Ⅱ组明显高于Ⅰ组(P〈0.05),Ⅱ组苏醒时头晕发生率明显高于Ⅰ组(P〈0.05)。结论与单用丙泊酚相比,舒芬太尼联合丙泊酚可以更加安全舒适的用于无痛纤维胃镜检查术。Objective To observe the anesthesia effect and safety of sufentanil and composite propofol used in painless fibergastroscopy. Methods We select 50 cases ASA Ⅰ - Ⅱ with painless fibergastroscopy,then divided them intoⅠgroups( dealing with sufentanil and propofol) and Ⅱgroup( dealing with propofol only),25 cases in each group. InⅠ group,5 ugsufentanilis used in patients by intravenous drip,and after 2 minutes,1. 5 mg / kg propofol is used by intravenous injection; InⅡ group,only 2. 5 mg / kg propofol is used by intravenous injection. When necessary,add propofol 0. 2- 0. 3 mg / kg for patients of each group,then we compare two groups of narcotic analgesic effect and the security,and record the change of HR,RR,SBP,Sp O2 of two groups of patients before delivery T0,after 2 minutes T1,through throat T2 and at wake T3,also,we record the anesthesia effective time,wake up time and time of departure from the hospital,and the adverse reactions after anesthesia. Results Anesthesia effect inⅠ group is better than that of Ⅱgroup,HR of two groups patients is slower at T1( P〈0. 05),SBP and Sp O2 are significantly lower at T0( P〈0. 05). At T1,T2 and T3,HR of Ⅱgroup is slow,and SBP is l less than Ⅰgroup at( P〈0. 05). When through throat of Ⅱgrouppatients,choking cough is obviously higher than Ⅰgroup patients at( P〈0. 05). The effective time,waking time,departure from the hospital time ofⅡ group patients are longer than that ofⅠ group at( P〈0. 05). The dosage of propofol forⅡ group patients is obviously higher than that ofⅠ group at( P〈0. 05). During operation,tongue falling,breath depression inⅡ group patinets are significantly more than that inⅠ group patients at( P〈0. 05),also,when patients wake up,the incidence of dizziness inⅡ group is obviously higher than that in Ⅰgroup at( P〈0. 05). Conclusions Compared with the method of only using propofol,the sufentanil combined with propofol can be more safe and comfortable for treatment of p
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.228