欲望管制与价值建构——“革命文艺”的文化史意义  

Regulation of Desire and Construction of Value: the Cultural-historical Significance of “Revolutionary Literature”

作　　者：邵明[1] 

机构地区：[1]中共安徽省委党校,安徽合肥230022

出　　处：《重庆三峡学院学报》2015年第2期78-82,共5页Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University

摘　　要："革命文艺"以革命者的个体欲望遭受极度压抑作为革命叙事的起点,并将个体欲望组织进入阶级斗争的理论之中。"革命文艺"的欲望叙述具有双重性:既体现了以社会公正为目标的价值建构方向,也显示出对于低效社会运作的无反思状况。新时期文论话语片面否定"革命文艺"的欲望管制,从而难以全面评价"革命文艺"并导致新的价值困境。The ＂Revolutionary Literature＂ takes as the point of departure the supreme suppression of the desire of individuals, and weaves the desire of individual into the Theory of Class Struggle. The desire narration of the ＂Revolutionary Literature＂ is dual in nature： it reflects the value construction orientation of taking social justice as the aim, and refusal to reflect on the low-efficient working of the society. The literary criticism in the New Age has a partial denial of the regulation of desire in the ＂Revolutionary Literature＂ so that the ＂Revolutionary Literature ＂ cannot be criticized in an entire angle and the literary criticism may slid into a new dilemma of value.

关 键 词：革命文艺 欲望 价值建构 

分 类 号：I206.7[文学—中国文学]