检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学管理学院,上海200433 [2]上海财经大学经济学院,上海200433 [3]中国人民银行上海总部,上海200120
出 处:《管理科学学报》2015年第2期1-12,94,共13页Journal of Management Sciences in China
基 金:上海市浦江人才计划资助项目(10PGC040);上海市教育委员会科研创新资助项目(13ZS055);上海财经大学博士研究生研究基金资助项目(CXJJ-2011-398)
摘 要:通过建立博弈论模型比较了双向声誉机制中的同步声誉机制和非同步声誉机制在实现诚实评价方面的有效性.结论表明,当买家严格偏好惩罚某种类型的卖家时,非同步声誉机制产生的评价不能真实反映坏的交易结果,如果要让非同步声誉机制实现诚实评价,则需要增加诸多约束条件.另一方面,同步声誉机制能够实现诚实评价,而且当买家严格偏好惩罚某种类型的卖家时,诚实评价还是同步声誉机制唯一的均衡.This paper uses game theory models to study and compare the efficiency differences in sustaining truthful feedback between simultaneously-revealed and non-simultaneously-revealed bilateral reputation sys-tems. We find that the equilibrium feedback of the non-simultaneously-revealed bilateral reputation system does not reflect bad trading outcome when the buyers strictly prefer to punish certain type of sellers. Strict con-straints on both seller’s and buyer’s behavior are required shall non-simultaneously-revealed bilateral reputa-tion system be able to reflect bad trading. On the other hand,truthful feedback can be sustained by simultane-ously-revealed bilateral reputation system and is the only equilibrium outcome when the buyers strictly prefer to punish certain type of buyers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.168