检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李尚桦[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学,上海200438
出 处:《行政与法》2015年第3期121-128,F0003,共9页Administration and Law
摘 要:股权众筹作为一种新的互联网金融形态,已然对传统融资造成了较大冲击,引发了"无法可依"的尴尬局面。美国JOBS法案对股权众筹的合法化尝试确属顺应趋势而先行一步。但是,我们对其借鉴应抱合理态度,不仅需考虑时机是否合宜,避免空谈加强监管或与时俱进地放开股权众筹,而且不应该停留在对细规的逐条移植上,应该分析其背后的理念与实践中可能产生的问题,以期为我所用。Equity crowdfunding as a new form of internet finance,have made a strong impact on the traditional financing and led to a lawless embarrassing situation.U.S.JOBS Act attempts to legalize equity crowdfunding that is regarded as a progress to associate with the trend.However,it should adopt a reasonable attitude to equity crowdfunding and the Act:consider whether it was an opportune time and avoid prattling strengthening the regulatory or releasing equity crowdfunding;instead of transplanting item by item,it is necessarily to analyze idea behind the JOBS Act and anticipate possible problems in practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117