《维也纳条约法公约》第31.3条“任何相关国际法规则”研究  

On the Preservation of International Law System in Treaty Interpretation:From the Perspective of Article 31. 3( c) of VCLT

作　　者：冯寿波[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京信息工程大学公共管理学院,南京210044

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2015年第1期65-72,共8页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：《维也纳条约法公约》第31.3条(c)项在澄清条约模糊、填补空白的同时也留下了诸多疑问:哪些规则具有相关性?"适用于当事国间关系的"这个短语是否对可以适用的国际法规则的范围具有限制性作用?是否是指条约解释之时处于生效状态的国际法的全部?因此,对第31.3条(c)项立法沿革、用语含义以及相关国际司法实践的探究,对于深入了解国际条约解释规则作用的机理具有积极意义。对时际法性质的理解是审视第31.3条(c)项的一个必要前提。条约解释通常难免借助于其后的相关新条约。There is no consensus as to the following issues in academic circles： whether the international law system and its hierarchy and self- contentedness exist,the meaning of Article 31. 3（ c）,and what role in enhancing the international law system Article 31. 3（ c） plays,and so on. Although ＂fragmentation＂and relative ＂self- contentedness＂still exist in the international law system,the international law has an evolving system on the basis of the common value,the developing hierarchy and the integration of the international law system through Article 3. 3（ c） of VCLT. ＂Fragmentation＂erodes but cannot deny the system of international law. The causes of the erosion of the international law system are complicated. The present situation depends on the reality of the power structure of international community. Article 31. 3（ c） has the function of integration and development of international law,which preserves the system of international law from the perspective of treaty interpretation.

关 键 词：《维也纳条约法公约》 第31.3条(c)项 条约解释 相关国际法规则 

分 类 号：DF938[政治法律—国际法学]