检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘引玲[1]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《江西科技师范大学学报》2015年第1期60-68,共9页Journal of Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University
摘 要:侵害亲属身份权需要承担民事责任是基本法律原理,而对于其理解和适用在亲属身份权领域存在很大距离。本文针对这一实务具体问题做出分析研究。从亲属身份权精神损害赔偿的法律基础入手,论述精神损害赔偿制度的功能,最后分析亲属身份权精神损害赔偿的实践。作者从法律原理与实务相结合予以阐述,试图实现精神损害赔偿在亲属身份权领域的准确适用,使得亲属身份权能够获得法律上的救济,恢复其圆满状态。it is a basic principle of law that someone is requested for bearing civil liability when he encroaches on the identity right of relatives, but the distance between applying and understanding the identity right of relatives is quite big. The paper studies and analyzes the practice of specific issues. It begins with the basis of law regard to mental damage compensation of the identity right of relatives, discusses the function of mental damage compensation system, and analyzes the practice regard to mental damage compensation of the identity right of relatives. The author explains it with the combination of legal doctrines and the practice, and tries to clarify the exact application of mental damage compensation of the identity right of relatives, so that the identity right of relatives could obtain judicial relief and regain its perfect state.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117