我国人文社会科学学科多样性研究  

Study of Discipline Diversity in the Field of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences

作　　者：马费成[1] 陈柏彤[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学信息资源研究中心,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《情报科学》2015年第4期3-8,63,共7页Information Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(71173249)

摘　　要：基于1998-2011年CSSCI期刊引文数据,从学科多样性的角度对中国人文社会科学跨学科属性进行分析。以学科多样性代表学科交叉程度,整合跨学科引用和被引两个方向上强度、广度、均匀性三个维度属性,使用布里渊指数作为多样性测度指标。本文提供一个考察中文社科整体学科属性的研究视角,结果表明:布里渊指数能够较好反映学科引用和被引多样性,引用多样性方面,民族学最高,语言学最低;被引多样性方面,政治学最高,体育学最低。对综合多样性的分析可将中文社科23个学科划分为6个多样性水平,图书馆、情报与文献学处于低水平,对引用率和被引率的统计印证多样性分析结果是可靠准确的。最后针对图书馆、情报与文献学多样性水平较低的现状,给出了相应建议和展望。Based on 1998-2011 journal citation data collected from CSSCI, this paper analyzes interdisci- plinarity of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences from the perspective of discipline diversity. Diversity represents the degree of interdisciplinarity, which is the integration of intensity, breadth and balance prop- erties in both citing and cited directions. Brillouin＇ s Index is used as the indicator of diversity measure. This paper provides a research perspective to study the holistic properties of Chinese Humanities and So- cial Sciences. The results show that Brillouin＇ s Index is a proper indicator reflecting discipline diversity. For citing diversity values, the highest is ethnology, and the lowest is linguistics. For cited diversity val- ues, the highest is politics, and the lowest is physical education. 23 disciplines of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences can be divided into six diversity levels according to the synthesized diversity, among which library and information science is at the low level. The statistics of citing and cited rate confirms that the results are reliable. In addition, considering the low level of diversity in the field of library and in- formation science, suggestions for future improving are also proposed.

关 键 词：人文社会科学 学科交叉 多样性 布里渊指数 CSSCI 

分 类 号：G250.2[文化科学—图书馆学]