沙利度胺与甲磺酸托烷司琼治疗CHOP方案化疗所致呕吐的临床效果比较  

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:冯林[1] 梁桐尔 

机构地区:[1]泸州医学院附属医院血液科,四川泸州646000

出  处:《医学美学美容(中旬刊)》2015年第2期16-16,共1页

摘  要:目的探讨临床治疗CHOP方案化疗所致呕吐的经济且有效的方法。方法选取我科2012—2014年期间初诊非霍奇金淋巴瘤行首次CHOP方案化疗的患者60例,随机分成沙利度胺组(采用沙利度胺口服治疗)及甲磺酸托烷司琼组(采用甲磺酸托烷司琼静脉推注治疗),每组30例。结果沙利度胺组止吐有效率与甲磺酸托烷司琼组相当,差异不具统计学意义(P〉0.05);而沙利度胺组在化疗时出现焦虑的患者明显少于甲磺酸托烷司琼组,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论CHOP方案化疗前采用沙利度胺止吐的临床效果与采用甲磺酸托烷司琼治疗的临床效果相当,但沙利度胺更经济、临床使用更为方便,同时还有较明显缓解化疗时焦虑情绪的作用,使首次化疗患者能更加耐受CHOP方案化疗。Objective:To discuss the cost -effective way of treating emesis caused by CHOP chemotherapy. Method :60 cases of NHL patients who received the 1 st CHOP chemotherapy in our department were chosen from 2012 -2014, and divided randomly into thalidomide group( treated by thalidomide orally) and tropisetron mesylate group(treated by tropisetron mesylate intravenous injection ), of each group was 30 cases. Results : Anti - nausea effect of the two groups is nearly the same, and there is no statistically significant difference ( P 〉 0.05 ) ; while patients who demonstrate anxiety are obviously less in thalidomide group than those in tropisetron mesylate group, and the difference is of statistical significance ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion : The anti - nausea effect of thalidomide and tropisetron mesylate administered before CHOP chemotherapy is nearly the same, however thalidomide is of better economy and more convenience for clinical, meantime thalidomide can relieve anxiety under chemotherapy more clearly, and make chemotherapy patients for the first time better tolerate CHOP chemotherapy.

关 键 词:沙利度胺 甲磺酸托烷司琼 非霍奇金淋巴瘤 CHOP方案化疗 呕吐 

分 类 号:R722.12[医药卫生—儿科]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象