检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王健[1] 相永梅[1] 郝长宏[1] 侯志鹏[1]
机构地区:[1]沈阳军区总医院,沈阳110840
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2015年第3期246-248,共3页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的观察浮刺治疗颞下颌关节紊乱的临床疗效。方法将60例颞下颌关节紊乱患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组30例。治疗组采用浮刺治疗,治疗后令患者做张口闭口动作;对照组采用常规针刺治疗。每日1次,10d为1个疗程。治疗2个疗程后,比较两组临床疗效。结果治疗组治疗1个疗程后总有效率为89.7%,对照组为86.2%;治疗组治疗2个疗程后总有效率为96.6%,对照组为93.1%。两组治疗2个疗程后疗效比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组复发率为5.0%,对照组为33.3%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论浮刺是一种治疗颞下颌关节紊乱的有效方法。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of superficial needling in treating temporomandibular joint disorder. Method Sixty patients with temporomandibular joint disorder were randomized into a treatment group and a control group, 30 in each group. The treatment group was intervened by superficial needling, and the patients were asked to repeatedly open and close mouth after the treatment; the control group was intervened by regalar acupuncture. The treatment was given once a day, 10 d as a treatment course. The clinical efficaeies were compared after 2 treatment courses. Result After the first treatment course, the total effective rate was 89.7% in the treatment group versus 86.2% in the control group; after the second course, the total effective rate was 96.6% in the treatment group versus 93.1% in the control group. There was a significant difference in comparing the therapeutic efficacy between the two groups after the second course (P〈0.05). The relapse rate was 5.0~/; in the treatment group versus 33.3% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion Superficial needling is an effective method in treating temporomandibular joint disorder.
分 类 号:R246.8[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38