认真对待案例评析:一个法教义学的立场  

Taking Case Notes Seriously:From the Standpoint of Legal Doctrinism

作　　者：贺剑[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《比较法研究》2015年第2期172-185,共14页Journal of Comparative Law

摘　　要：改革开放以来,案例研究在我国经历了20世纪90年代和现今的两次研究热潮,但案例研究在本体论层面是什么并未得到认真对待。纵观比较法经验,案例研究是一类与论文、书评等相比有着显著特点的独立的法学文献,具有篇幅简短、个案取向、偏重教义三个特征。在我国,案例评析可以辅佐和围观司法实务,也可以为部门法和非部门法研究提供教义学基础。对公报案例、指导性案例的评析举隅以及对相关理论的澄清都是有力说明。案例评析在我国的推广,有待于主流法学期刊的开放和学术评价体制的微调,亦需在写作体例和文献运用上予以规范。案例评析的昌明,将成为我国法教义学昌明的重要标志。During the ebbs and flows of the passion in studying cases in Chinese legal scholarship, the question, what is a case study （or more accurately, a case note） , has never been taken seriously. Based on the exploration of comparative law, the case note is an independent member in the legal literature family, which is strictly different from other members like articles and book reviews. In the context of Chinese law, the case note has mainly two functions, namely, providing arguments for and reflections on the judicial practice; and providing solid doctrinal analysis on cases for doctrinal and theoretical legal studies. The flourishing of case notes in China requires not only more access to legal journals, but also the modification of the academic evaluation system; moreover, the establishment of standards or rules related to styles, structures and materials of case notes are also necessary. Case notes are closely connected to legal doctrinism. When the day of legal doctrinism really comes, case notes will also flourish.

关 键 词：案例研究 案例评析 法教义学 法学文献 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]