检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:狄军贞[1] 朱志涛[1] 江富[1] 戴男男 郭旭颖[2]
机构地区:[1]辽宁工程技术大学建筑工程学院,辽宁阜新123000 [2]辽宁工程技术大学理学院,辽宁阜新123000
出 处:《非金属矿》2015年第2期71-73,共3页Non-Metallic Mines
基 金:国家自然科学基金(41102157)
摘 要:采用添加硫酸盐还原菌(SRB)与零价铁(Fe0)构建以麦饭石(MFS)为主体的可渗透性反应墙,模拟井下煤矿酸性废水(AMD)原位修复过程,比较生化强化与物化强化两种方式对处理能力的影响。结果表明,添加硫酸盐还原菌的麦饭石(SRB-MFS)和添加零价铁的麦饭石(Fe0-MFS)去除能力均强于单独MFS;SRB-MFS对SO42-的去除有明显优势,但对Mn2+的去除不及Fe0-MFS,两种强化方式对可溶性Fe2+的去除效果差别不大,出水均为弱碱性。Sulfate reducing bacteria(SRB) and zero-valent iron(Fe0) were added to permeable reactive barriers(PRB) containing maifan stone(MFS) respectively. An experiment simulated the process of treating AMD in-situ by these PRBs was conducted to investigate the effects of different reinforcement modes: one strengthened by biochemistry and the other strengthened by physicochemistry. The results showed that both PRB-1(SRBMFS) packed with SRB and MFS and PRB-2(Fe0-MFS) packed with Fe0 and MFS had a batter performance than PRB-3 packed with MFS alone. The SRB-MFS had a higher SO42- removal efficiency than others, but lower Mn2+ removal efficiency when compared to Fe0-MFS. However approximate Fe2+ removal efficiencies were achieved by SRB-MFS and Fe0-MFS, as well as both effluent p H value were neutral or alkalescency.
关 键 词:麦饭石 硫酸盐还原菌 零价铁 煤矿酸性废水 井下处理
分 类 号:X703[环境科学与工程—环境工程] TD985[矿业工程—选矿]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222