2种血液灌流器预冲方法的效果比较  

Two Different Methods Piercing on Blood Perfusion Pre-washed Effect

作　　者：陈雪芳[1] 王红梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京医科大学附属苏州医院,江苏苏州215008

出　　处：《中国伤残医学》2015年第7期35-37,共3页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine

基　　金：南京医科大学科技发展基金项目,项目编号：2013NJMU218

摘　　要：目的：探讨2种不同预冲方法对血液灌流预冲效果的影响。方法：将70例次需行血液灌流的患者随机分为常规组和改良组。2组分别采用不同的方法进行血液灌流器的预冲，对预冲时间、预冲肝素用量及治疗中血路管和灌流器凝血情况等数据进行统计分析。结果：2种不同预冲方法，对血液灌流过程中管路和灌流器的凝血的影响无显著性差异（p﹥0．05）；改良组的预冲时间较常规组节约31％，预冲肝素用量减少30％。结论：改良后的预冲方法减少了预冲时间，提高了工作效率，减少了肝素用量，灌流器凝血发生率并没增加，能完成血液灌流的治疗，值得在临床推广。Objective：To study the two different methods piercing on blood perfusion pre-washed effect.Methods：70 cases need to line the blood perfusion of the patients were randomly divided into normal group and improvement group.two groups, respectively, using different methods to blood perfusion apparatus, piercing, the time of the forecast and heparin dosage and treatment in the crowd tube piercing and perfusion coagulation conditions such as data for statistical analysis.Results：the two different methods, piercing pipe in the process of blood perfusion and the influence of perfusion of blood coagulation there was no significant difference （ p〈0.05）;Improved group of rush time saving in the normal group 31%, piercing heparin dosage reduced by 30%.Conclusion：the improved method can reduce the time of piercing piercing, improve work efficiency, reduce the dosage of heparin, perfusion coagulation rate didn＇t increase, can complete the blood perfusion treatment, is worth popularizing in clinical.

关 键 词：血液灌流 预冲 灌流器 凝血 

分 类 号：R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]