检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]厦门大学经济学院财政系
出 处:《经济学(季刊)》2015年第1期435-452,共18页China Economic Quarterly
基 金:国家社科重大项目(10zd&036);福建省社会科学规划项目(2014B110)的资助
摘 要:为了检验"中国财政分权与经济增长关系"的主要实证结果是否受到具体研究特征的影响,文章选取了现有主要实证文献进行荟萃分析。实证结果表明:中国财政分权对经济增长影响的不同实证结果受到不同研究特征的影响,尤其是"正向显著效应"的实证结果受到"区域、劳资增长率、其他改制、预算内资金"等研究特征的显著影响。通过漏斗不对称检验后发现,样本文献存在发表偏倚问题,且发表偏倚主要发生在支出分权上。In order to scrutinize whether the results of the empirical literatures on "fiscal decentralization and economic growth in China" are affected by the characteristics of specific studies, this paper has selected some high-quality empirical studies for meta-analysis. The resuits show that some empirical results were correlated with some characteristics of different studies, especially that the result of "fiscal decentralization helping to promote economic growth in China" was significantly influenced by "region, K/L, revolve, budgetary". By means of the funnel plot asymmetry analysis, it is discovered that there were some publication biases in the sample studies, which mainly concentrated on the issue of fiscal expenditure decentralization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117