美国对华产品适用反补贴法中的行政方法与司法方法  

The Administrative and Judicial Methods in Application of Law on Countervailing Duty by the US on Chinese Products

作　　者：彭岳[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院

出　　处：《北方法学》2015年第2期71-83,共13页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：中国法学会2013年度部级法学研究课题"美国对华反补贴调查与SCM协定不符问题研究"[项目编号CLS(2013)Y38]的研究成果

摘　　要：美国商务部对华产品适用反补贴法历经三个阶段,其间政策虽屡有变更,但基本的法律分析方法并没发生改变。对于商务部的抽象理论分析方法和法律推定,美国国际贸易法院和联邦巡回上诉法院并不赞同,甚至持反对意见。而这也导致相关案件一波三折,迟迟难有定论。在"Chevron遵从"法则下,法院对于商务部的行政方法难以实施有效审查。中国仍需借助WTO争端解决机制,持续对美国政府施加国际压力,限制商务部滥用抽象理论和法律推定。The application of the Countervailing Duty Law by the US Department of Commerce on Chinese products have endured three phases with changes of policies yet no change of basic legal analysis method.With regard to abstract theoretical analysis and legal presumptions adopted by the Department of Commerce,American Court of International Trade and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit do not agree with such method and even oppose it,so that relevant cases are rather hard to be settled. In accordance with the doctrine of ＂Chevron reference＂,the court can not undertake effective reviews on the administrative method adopted by the Department of Commerce. China should resort to WTO Disputes Settlements Mechanism and continue imposing international pressure on the US government to restrict their Department of Commerce from abusing the abstract theoretical analysis and legal presumptions.

关 键 词：反补贴法 行政方法 司法方法 Chevron遵从 

分 类 号：F757.12[经济管理—国际贸易]