检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院内分泌一病房,150001 [2]哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院内分泌二病房,150001 [3]哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院护理部,150001
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2015年第5期497-500,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基 金:国家临床重点专科建设项目(2012-649)
摘 要:目的:探讨同伴支持对社区独居代谢综合征患者自我效能和生存质量的影响。方法采取便利抽样方法选取2013年3—6月哈尔滨市某社区服务中心站的6个社区的独居代谢综合征患者90例作为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组45例,对照组患者不接受同伴支持干预,观察组患者接受同伴支持,采用自我护理能力测定表( ESCA)、生活质量量表( QOL)评价两组干预效果。结果干预后,观察组患者自我效能总分为(126.98±10.13)分,对照组患者为(108.56±9.75)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=5.954,P〈0.05);干预后观察组患者总体生存质量为(42.62±5.86)分,对照组患者为(34.76±5.15)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=3.543,P〈0.05)。结论同伴支持对社区独居代谢综合征患者自我效能和生存质量均有积极改善效果,值得推广。Objective To investigate the effect of peer support on self-efficacy and quality of life in metabolic syndrome patients living alone in community. Methods A total of 90 patients with metabolic syndrome as the research object, while the patients receiving no peer support interventions were divided into control group and the patients receiving peer support were the observation group, 45 patients in each group. The intervention results of patients were evaluated by the exercise of self-care agency scale ( ESCA) and quality of life scale (QOL). Results After intervention, it was (126. 98 ± 10. 13) score in the observation group comparing with (108. 56 ± 9. 75) in the control group for self-efficacy (t=5. 954,P〈0. 05). The scores of life quality for patients in the observation group was (42. 62 ± 5. 86) comparing with (34. 76 ± 5. 15) in the control group (t=3. 543, P 〈0. 05). Conclusions Peer support on self-efficacy and quality of life in metabolic syndrome patients living alone in the community have positive improvement, which is worthy to promote in the clinical.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145