检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:席明霞[1] 覃琴[2] 卿利敏[3] 唐朝[2] 骆咏梅
机构地区:[1]长沙市中心医院护理部,410001 [2]南华大学护理学院,衡阳市421001 [3]湖南省肿瘤医院重症医学科,长沙市410001
出 处:《护理管理杂志》2015年第3期189-191,共3页Journal of Nursing Administration
基 金:2013年湖南省科技计划项目(2013FJ6033)
摘 要:目的探讨连续性协同护理模式在COPD稳定期患者肺康复训练中的应用。方法将201例病情稳定的患者采用随机数字表法分为观察组(100例)和对照组(101例)。观察组患者实施连续性协同护理模式,包括知识指导、康复训练、随访干预。对照组患者接受常规护理,出院后进行不定期随访。比较干预前后两组患者肺功能和自我护理行为情况。结果干预后观察组患者肺功能和自我护理行为明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01或P<0.05)。结论连续性协同护理模式有利于增强COPD患者肺康复依从性,改善其肺功能和自我护理行为,最终提高患者的生活质量。Objective To explore the application and effects of continuous collaborative care model in pulmonary rehabilitation training for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Totally,201 COPD patients in stable condition were divided into the experimental group ( 100 cases) and the control group ( 101 cases) using random number table. Patients in the experimental group received continuous collaborative care model including knowl- edge instruction, rehabilitation guidance and follow - up intervention. Patients in the control group received conventional care, unscheduled follow - up service af- ter discharge. Pulmonary function and self - care behavior of patients in the two groups were compared before and after intervention. Results After intervention, pulmonary function and self - care of patients in the experimental group were better than those of the control group ( P 〈 0.01 or P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The continuous collaborative care model can improve pulmonary rehabilitation compliance, pulmonary function and selfcare, and then improve the quality of life in COPD patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28