动力型外固定支架及锁定加压钢板固定在桡骨远端粉碎性骨折中的应用效果比较  

The application effect comparison of dynamic external fixation bracket and locking compression plate fixation in treatment of comminuted distal radius fracture

作　　者：章武星 吴方前 罗光清 郑常青[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西省抚州市第一人民医院骨科,江西抚州344000

出　　处：《中国当代医药》2015年第7期78-80,共3页China Modern Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较动力型外固定支架及锁定加压钢板固定治疗桡骨远端粉碎性骨折的效果。方法选取70例桡骨远端粉碎性骨折患者为研究对象,将其随机分为观察组与对照组,观察组给予动力型外固定支架治疗,对照组给予锁定加压钢板固定治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果观察组骨折复位与Dienst腕关节功能的优良率均高于对照组(P<0.05),不良反应发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与锁定加压钢板固定比较,动力型外固定支架治疗桡骨远端粉碎性骨折的效果更佳,值得推广。Objective To compare the effect of dynamic external fixation bracket and locking compression plate fixation in treatment of comminuted distal radius fracture. Methods 70 patients with comminuted distal radius fracture were se-lected as the research objects,and they were randomly divided into the observation group and control group,the observa-tion group was treated with dynamic external fixation bracket,while the control group was treated with locking compres-sion plate fixation,the clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results The excellent and good rate of fracture reduction and Dienst wrist function score in the observation group was higher than that of the control group respectively （P〈0.05）;the incidence rate of adverse reaction of the observation group was lower than that of the control group,the difference was statistical （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Compared with locking compression plate fixation,dynamic external fix-ation bracket for the treatment of comminuted distal radius fracture has better effect,and it is worthy of promotion.

关 键 词：桡骨远端粉碎性骨折 动力型外固定支架 锁定加压钢板固定 

分 类 号：R683.41[医药卫生—骨科学]