检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学经贸管理学院,江苏南京210023
出 处:《中国医药导报》2015年第8期105-108,共4页China Medical Herald
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(编号11YJA630112);江苏省社会科学基金项目(编号10GLD018)
摘 要:新一轮基本药物招标采购更加注重从降低药品价格到注重药品质量和价格综合效果的转变。本文通过分析新版基本药物目录下不同招标模式的质价关系,探究了基本药物招标采购要实现"优质优价"存在的问题:超低价中标导致质量堪忧、"双信封"制度的失效、"量价挂钩"利弊难断、"单一货源"前途未卜等,并就存在的问题提出了相关的政策建议。The new round bidding procurement has paid more attention to the comprehensive effect of the drug quality and price from lowering drug prices. Based on the analysis of the correlations between quality and price in different bidding procurement modes for essential drugs, the thesis explores the plight of implement "high quality and favorable price", such as ultra low-cost in bidding result in poor quality, "double envelope system" failure, "quantity links up with price" good or bad is difficult to predict, "single source" faces an uncertain future. And then the thesis puts forward relevant policy suggestions to implement "high quality and favorable price" in essential drug bidding procurement.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188