检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵敬[1]
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学外语学院
出 处:《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》2015年第2期139-144,共6页Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
基 金:教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目"日本的文化政策及文化发展战略研究"(11YJCGJW023)的成果之一;对外经济贸易大学校级特色科研项目"国际媒体倾向性指数"(TS3-05)的研究资助
摘 要:日本的地方文化行政变革是:从服从中央政令向地方自主转变,从中央集权向地方分权转变,从实现文化振兴向生活文化建设转变,从重视行政职能和效率向以人为本转变,从以居民为客体的管理型行政向以居民为主体的自治型行政转变。其核心理念是从"文化的行政化"向"行政的文化化"转变。考察和借鉴日本地方文化行政变革的经验,对探讨我国地方文化行政体制改革和研究如何在新型城镇化进程中推进城镇文化建设很有意义。The changes in Japan's local cultural administration after the second World War are reflected in five aspects: from the autocratic administration of the central government to the decentralized administration of the local autonomy; from the administration based on central command to independent administration led by local autonomy; from the sectoral ad- ministration aimed at cultural revitalization to the comprehensive administration supporting the life and culture for local residents; from the obligation and efficiency oriented adminis- tration to the people oriented administration; from management-oriented administration dominating the people to the autonomic and cooperative administration subjected to peo- ple. The core idea in the transition can be explained as culture's administerization was re- placed by the administration's culturalization. China is now in the critical moment of urbani- zation. It is feasible to look into Japan's experience of how its local cultural administration was reformed, so that to discuss the future direction of China's local cultural administration reform, as well as to design the urban culture in the process of the new-type urbanization.
分 类 号:D731.3[政治法律—政治学] D630[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.2.200