论生态恢复裁判方式的法制化——以赎刑制度的后现代改造为视角  

Theory on the Legalization of the Ruling Way of Ecological Recovery

作　　者：邓晓东[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学法学院,福建福州350117

出　　处：《福建师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第2期8-14,166,共7页Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：福建省社科规划一般项目<生态恢复裁判方式的法制化研究>(项目编号:2014B231)

摘　　要：福建法院创造的生态恢复裁判方式在恢复性司法理论指导下,通过刑事附带民事诉讼和司法命令的程序解决涉林刑事案件"一判三输"难题,引领了全国法院生态审判专业化先河。但以刑事和解为核心的传统恢复性司法理论无法正确诠释公害性环境犯罪的法益恢复问题,制约了生态恢复裁判方式在环境犯罪案件全领域的法制化。在生态中心主义生态伦理观下解构环境犯罪,泛化恢复性司法的主体结构关系,通过购买碳汇、补植管护等形式改造传统赎刑制度实现短期监禁刑的易科,这应是一条可资探究的法制化进路。Fujian courts have created the ruling way of ecological restoration to solve 'one sentence,three aspects of good social effect unavailable'problem in criminal cases concerning forestry under the guidance of the theory of restorative justice and through the civil suit collateral to criminal proceedings and the judicial command program,leading the ecological trial specialization among national courts. But the traditional restorative justice theory with focus on criminal reconciliation fails to correctly interpret the problem of legal interest recovery of hazardous environment pollution crime,and restricts the full spectrum legalization of the ruling way of ecological recovery in the cases of environmental crime. Under the circumstances of the ecocentrism and ecological ethic,it should be a approach to explore the legalization to deconstruct environmental crime,generalize the body structure relationship of restorative justice and transform traditional redeem punishment system to realize short-term imprisonment penalty through the forms of purchasing carbon sequestration and replanting management.

关 键 词：生态恢复 赎刑制度 生态中心主义 恢复性司法 

分 类 号：DF46[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]