检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨体育学院运动科学与健康系,黑龙江哈尔滨150008 [2]哈尔滨体育学院科学实验研究中心,黑龙江哈尔滨150008
出 处:《哈尔滨体育学院学报》2015年第1期7-11,共5页Journal of Harbin Sport University
基 金:黑龙江省普通高等学校青年学术骨干支持计划(编号:1253G037)
摘 要:目的:寻找索契冬奥会单板U型场地滑雪男子运动员决赛成绩与难度战术间的关联性,为该项目训练、备战提供资料。方法:采用观察法、调查访谈法和对比分析法,对索契冬奥会单板U型场地决赛12名男子运动员两轮比赛的技术动作进行对比分析,研究其比赛成绩与难度战术选择间的关联性,并与温哥华冬奥会女子决赛难度战术进行比较。结果:8名成绩上升选手与4名成绩下降选手中均有加难及维持难度战术的选择,且其成绩与难度战术无关,本届比赛中运动员的难度战术选择趋势与温哥华冬奥会相同。结论:索契冬奥会单板U型场地滑雪男子决赛比赛成绩与难度战术选择关联性不大,与温哥华冬奥会难度战术趋势相同。The purpose is to find out the association between the final results of male half- pipe athletes in Sochi Winter Olympics and the difficult tactics, providing the references for the training and the preparation for matches. Methods : With the methods of observation, ex- pert interview and comparative analysis, the paper has compared and analysed two routines of technical difficulty motions of 12 male athletes in the half - pipe final of Sochi Winter Olym- pics, so as to find out the association between the final results and the difficult tactics, as well as comparing them with the ones in Vancouver Winter Olympics. Results: In the 8 male athletes with higher results and the 4 ones with lower results, difficult tactics of improvement and maintenance were selected. No relation was found between final results and the difficult tactics. Compared to the Vancouver Winter Olympics, the trend of difficult tactic choosing in athletes was identical to the one in Vancouver Winter Olympics. Conclusions: There was no association between the final results of male half - pipe athletes in Sochi Winter Olympics and the difficult tactics and the trend of difficult tactics in Sochi was identical to the one in Vancouver Winter Olympics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222