沙丁胺醇经气动雾化吸入法和超声雾化吸入法治疗支气管哮喘急性发作期的效果比较  

The curative effect comparison of salbutamol by pneumatic atomization inhalation and ultrasonic atomizing inhalation in treatment of acute attack of bronchial asthma

作　　者：魏永平 阙伟东 叶定村 

机构地区：[1]深圳市宝安区沙井人民医院社康中心,深圳518101

出　　处：《中国当代医药》2015年第9期80-81,84,共3页China Modern Medicine

摘　　要：目的研究气动雾化吸入和超声雾化吸入沙丁胺醇治疗支气管哮喘急性发作期的效果差异。方法选取本院2011年7月-2014年5月80例支气管哮喘急性发作期患者为研究对象,抽签随机分为观察组与对照组各40例,观察组采用沙丁胺醇经气动雾化吸入治疗,对照组采用超声雾化吸入法治疗,比较两组患者的康复时间指标及疗效。结果观察组咳嗽、气喘、肺部啰音、喘鸣音缓解时间分别为（4.31±1.15）、（3.87±1.42）、（6.30±1.78）、（4.18±1.62）d,显著短于对照组的（6.21±1.44）、（5.63±1.66）、（8.33±2.61）、（6.33±1.78）d,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;观察组总有效率为90.00%,高于对照组的67.50%,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论沙丁胺醇经气动雾化吸入法治疗支气管哮喘急性发作期的症状改善及临床疗效均优于超声雾化吸入法,具有较高的临床应用价值。Objective To study the curative effect of pneumatic nebulization inhalation and ultrasonic atomizing inhalation of salbutamol in treatment of acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma. Methods 80 cases of patients with acute attack of bronchial asthma in our hospital from July 2011 to May 2014 were selected,and were randomly divided into observation group and control group,40 cases of each group,the observation group adopted by pneumatic atomizing inhalation of salbutamol inhalation therapy,the control group adopted by ultrasonic atomization.The efficacy and rehabilitation time index of two groups was compared. Results In observation group,cough,asthma,pulmonary rales,wheezing sound remission time was（4.31±1.15） d,（3.87±1.42） d,（6.30±1.78） d,（4.18±1.62） d,was shorter than（6.21±1.44） d,（5.63±1.66） d,（8.33±2.61） d,（6.33±1.78） d of control group respectively,the difference was significant（P0.05）.The total effective rate of observation group was 90.00%,higher than 67.50% of control group,the difference was significant（P0.05）. Conclusion Improvement of symptoms and the clinical curative effect by pneumatic inhalation is superior to the ultrasonic atomization of atomizing inhalation,has high value in clinical application.

关 键 词：沙丁胺醇 经气动雾化吸入法 超声雾化吸入法 支气管哮喘 

分 类 号：R974[医药卫生—药品]