城乡规划法第64条执行中的问题与对策研究——从《关于规范城乡规划行政处罚裁量权的指导意见》谈起  

PROBLEMS AND COUNTERMEASURES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ARTICLE 64 OF THE URBAN-RURAL PLANNING LAW: A READING OF “GUIDANCE FOR STANDARDIZING ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY DISCRETION IN URBAN AND RURAL PLANNING”

作　　者：伍佳[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学城市与环境学院城市与区域规划系

出　　处：《城市规划》2015年第3期59-64,共6页City Planning Review

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目:"中国城市空间增长的低碳化形态模式研究"(编号41171130;2012-2015)资助

摘　　要：通过解读《关于规范城乡规划行政处罚裁量权的指导意见》的内容,详细讨论了对《城乡规划法》第64条相关内容的理解。区分了"尚可"和"无法"采取改正措施以消除对规划实施的影响两种情形,并提出各自的处理流程;提出与当前一些学者和从业人员观点不同的看法,强调要重视改正和拆除等措施以消除对规划实施的影响,认为拆除应作为"无法"情形下的首位处理措施,将罚款作为辅助管理手段;提出应当严格限定补办手续的应用范围。This paper discusses the content of Article 64 of the Urban-Rural Planning Law by reading the file ＂Guidance for Standardizing Administrative Penalty Discretion in Urban and Rural Planning.＂ This paper distinguishes two kinds of situations between ＂barely＂ and ＂impossibly＂ and their processes; it puts forward different understanding on the existing views of some scholars and practitioners, and attaches great importance to correction, demolition and other measures in eliminating the influence on plan implementation. The paper suggests that demolition should be the first priority when correction is ＂impossible,＂ and penalty in this case should be an auxiliary administrative tool; post-registration should be strictly limited.

关 键 词：城乡规划法第64条 行政处罚裁量权 规范裁量权 

分 类 号：D922.297[政治法律—经济法学]