检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林艺芳[1]
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第2期67-71,共5页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务基金中国人民大学研究生科研项目"前置性侦查研究"(13XNH031)成果
摘 要:我国刑事诉讼模式的扭曲导致了检察官在审前程序和审判程序中存在角色错位问题。检察官在审前程序中是客观中立的国家法律监督者,在审判程序中却转变为与辩护方积极平等对抗的控诉者。这种角色错位引起了一系列问题,包括非法证据排除规则的效力受到限制,案件事实无法得到全面发现等。解决检察官角色错位问题,首先要以当事人主义作为未来刑事司法改革的宏观模式选择;在此基础上,通过在审前程序中引入司法官和加强律师辩护权利实现检察官角色的转变。The distortion of criminal system in China leads to the dislocation of prosecutors' roles between pretrial procedure and trial. Prosecutors are supposed to be legal supervisors in pretrial procedure,while during trial they turn to be active prosecutors. The dislocation of prosecutors' roles causes other problems. For example,the effective of exclusionary rule is limited and the truth of cases can't be discovered fully. To solve the problems,first of all,we should choose adversary system as the further system in criminal judicial reform. Then we should also introduce judges into the pretrial procedure and strengthen lawyers' rights to realize the change of prosecutors' roles.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15