体词性成分指称性的强弱  

The Difference of Referentiality of Nominals

作　　者：王红旗[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学文学院,天津300071

出　　处：《语言科学》2015年第1期13-24,共12页Linguistic Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(11BYY093);天津市社科项目(TJZW07-2045)经费资助

摘　　要：体词性成分的指称性有强弱的差别,在词上就规定了其所指对象的指示代词、人称代词和专有名词的指称性强,而只能在特定语境的句子中才能落实其所指对象的普通名词的指称性弱。文章分析了汉语中指称性强弱不同的两类体词性成分的语义和语法表现,并根据指称性的强弱解释了与体词性成分有关的几种语法现象,即构词能力、古代汉语的名词用如动词、现代汉语的体词性成分作谓语。This paper argues that there is a difference in the referentiality of nominals. Demon- stratives, personal pronouns and proper nouns have stronger referentiality than common nouns because the former realize their unique reference with less help of the text than the latter. The paper describes the grammatical forms and the semantic functions of all the nominals and divides them into two types according to the difference in their referentiality of nominals. This paper analyses several grammatical phenomena such as the difference of the nominals in word-building, the predicative use of the nominals in archaic Chinese and the nominal predicates in light of the strength of their referentiality.

关 键 词：体词性成分 指称性 指称 述谓 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]