检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《图书情报工作》2015年第4期114-121,共8页Library and Information Service
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目"用户探寻式搜索策略分析及系统构建研究"(项目编号:71203163);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"社会性标签系统中用户信息搜寻行为研究"(项目编号:12YJC870011)研究成果之一
摘 要:[目的/意义]研究高校图书馆OPAC中引入分面搜索技术给用户带来怎样的搜索体验。[方法/过程]主要通过对用户在两种界面下(传统列表界面和基于列表与分面的界面)进行两种搜索任务(已知任务和探寻式任务)时所表现出的行为和喜好进行实验与观察,从搜索时间、搜索结果准确度、用户评价3方面对比分析搜索界面、搜索任务对用户搜索体验的影响。[结果/结论]通过研究发现:相对于传统列表界面,受试者在使用基于列表与分面的界面时,搜索用时更短、用户评价更高。[ Purpose/significance ] This study seeks to understand the differences between traditional library interface and facet-based interface and how they affect the search experience of users. [ Method/process] In this study, 40 partici- pants were asked to search for resources using both interfaces. Their search time and accuracy were measured across two types of search tasks ( known and exploratory). After completing the search tasks, they were asked a series of questions about their experiences. The data were analyzed in order to identify strengths and weaknesses in both search interfaces. [ Result/conclusion ] The results of this study show that search time for the face -based search interfaces was shorter and participants preferred the faced search interface over the traditional search interface.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.83.240