超越线性转型的乡村复兴——基于南京市高淳区两个典型村庄的比较  

Rural Renaissance that Beyond Linear Transformation: Comparative Study of Two Typical Villages in Gaochun, Nanjing

作　　者：张京祥[1] 申明锐[2] 赵晨 

机构地区：[1]南京大学建筑与城市规划学院,中国江苏南京210093 [2]香港中文大学地理与资源管理学系 [3]新加坡.南京生态科技岛管委会办公室,中国江苏南京210017

出　　处：《经济地理》2015年第3期1-8,共8页Economic Geography

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(41171134)

摘　　要：基于新时期中国乡村发展的问题与背景,学术界提出了"乡村复兴"的概念,这是从传统"乡村转型"概念的发展提升。乡村复兴强调彰显乡村发展自身的规律,注重当代城乡关系下对乡村独特社会、文化等价值的挖掘。方法上是依托城镇化的系统力量来促进和实现乡村自给与繁荣,从而在日渐趋稳、趋缓的城镇化态势下给乡村发展带来真正和长久的裨益。基于这样的价值立场,本文通过南京市高淳区武家嘴村、大山村两个典型村庄的比较研究,试图从乡村经济、空间、文化等方面对乡村复兴这一深刻内涵进行实证演绎。文章认为,中国乡村复兴的主体路径应该遵循的是一个超越以往"乡村工业化"、"乡村城镇化"的非线性转型过程。The concept of＂rural renaissance＂is proposed under the new context of rural development in contemporary China. In contrast to the linear trajectory that conventional rural transformation follows, rural renaissance highlights village＇s internal law of development as well as unique output of socio-culture value to present urban-rural relationship.Regarding to the method to revitalization, it emphasizes village＇s self-sufficient prosperity with the help of urbanization.Taking the stance of the presupposed value, this paper conducts a comparative study of Wujiazui and Dashan Village in Gaochun, Nanjing. From the perspectives of rural economy, space and culture, this paper gives an empirical deduction upon the concept of＂rural renaissance＂. Based on that, we further argues that the concrete pathway of rural renaissance should be a non-linear transformation process that beyond a sole city catching-up process.

关 键 词：城镇化 乡村复兴 非线性转型 武家嘴村 大山村 

分 类 号：F301.21[经济管理—产业经济]