生态人学的双重意涵:生态文明理论的人学之维  

Double Meanings of Ecological Humanism:Humanistic Dimension of Ecological Civilization Theory

作　　者：李勇强[1] 

机构地区：[1]第三军医大学政治理论与人文社科系,重庆400038

出　　处：《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》2015年第3期88-93,共6页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

基　　金：重庆市社科规划青年项目"基于马克思主义生态哲学观的生态文明理论研究"(2012QNZX006);项目负责人:李勇强;国家社会科学基金一般项目"马克思主义生态哲学体系的建构与创新研究"(12BZX026);项目负责人:孙道进;第三军医大学人文社科基金重点课题"环境问题视域下的马克思主义时代化研究(2013XRW01);项目负责人:李勇强

摘　　要：立足感性的对象性活动即实践,马克思主义生态人学观秉持自然向人而生与人向自然复归的双重意涵。这种人与自然辩证互动的双重意涵,为整合与超越生态中心主义把人还原为普通生物和人类中心主义以利益为圆心规定人提供了全新的方法与视域。承接马克思主义生态人学观思想的内在动源,社会主义生态文明理论超越了外来话语体系渲染的"自然人"与"利己人"的形而上学割裂与对峙,在对人与自然非合作性博弈的自觉矫正中,凭借实践的上通下达,牵引人的自由全面发展和人与自然的协同进化与联动。Based on the perceptual objective activity or practice,Marxist ecological view of humanism implicates the double meanings of nature： that being affected by human and that people return to nature. The double meanings of the dialectical interaction between human and nature provide a new method and the horizon to integrate and transcend eco-centralism and anthropocentrism. That is to say,this compensates the confliction between eco-centralism that reduced human beings to normal biology and anthropocentrism that only centered on the interests of human. Following Marx＇s ecological view of human thought,socialist ecological civilization theory transcends the metaphysical fragmentation and confrontation caused by foreign discourse system which rendering of ＂natural person＂and＂selfish man＂. With the conscious correction of non-cooperative game of man and nature,and with the practice on issues,it guides the comprehensive development of human freedom and the evolution and linkage between man and nature.

关 键 词：马克思主义 生态人学观 双重意涵 生态文明理论 人学之维 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]