“人生相涉论争”:文学自律性与功利性主张的对撞——兼论对我国文坛的影响  

“The Jinseisosyoronso-debate”: The Self-discipline and Utilitarianism of Literature——Discussion on Its Influence on Chinese Literature

作　　者：陈世华[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京工业大学外国语学院,江苏南京211816

出　　处：《东北亚外语研究》2015年第1期64-70,共7页Foreign Language Research in Northeast Asia

基　　金：2013年度江苏省社会科学基金项目"日本近代文学争论研究"(13WWB008)的阶段性成果

摘　　要："人生相涉论争"是明治维新时期在日本著名文学评论家北村透谷和史论家山路爱山之间展开的一场文学理论大论争。这场论争是文学自律性和文学功利性思想的碰撞,是近代日本就文学本质问题进行的重要讨论。通过这次论争,受卡莱尔思想影响的山路爱山,从史学家的观点出发,主张文学作品对现实社会的实际反映;受美国爱默生泛神论思想、拜伦以及易卜生文学思想影响的北村透谷,在亚洲最早提出了"文学"的概念,并用唯心主义理论确立了日本近代浪漫主义文学思想,这种日本早期浪漫主义思想对鲁迅等人的文学思想都产生过重要影响。＂The Jinseisosyoronso-debate＂ is an important disputation on literary theories at Meiji Reformation of Japan between Tokoku Kitamura, a famous Japanese literary critic, and Aizan Ymaji, a historical critic. It was a clash between literary self-discipline and utilitarianism and a significant debate on the nature of modern Japanese literature. Influenced by Thomas Carlyle, Aizan Ymaji proposed that literary works should represent social reality. Influenced by Emerson＇s Pantheism and literary theories of Byron and Ibsen, Tokoku Kitamura first proposed the concept of ＂literature＂ in Asia, and established the modern Japanese romanticism based on the idealism, which in its earlier years exerted great impact on such famous Chinese writers as Lu Xun.

关 键 词：人生相涉论争 北村透谷 山路爱山 文学自律 功利主义 

分 类 号：I106[文学—世界文学]