法秩序一致性与合宪性解释的实体性论证  

Substantive Demonstration of Legal Order Consistency and Constitutional Interpretation

作　　者：姜涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院

出　　处：《环球法律评论》2015年第2期141-157,共17页Global Law Review

基　　金："江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目"(PAPD);国家社科基金项目"刑事政策制约刑法解释的理论建构与制度实践研究"(项目编号:13CFX045)资助

摘　　要：作为重要的解释方法,合宪性解释立基于法秩序一致性之考虑,主张刑法解释不抵牾宪法的精神与原则,从而揭示刑法实践中的各种宪法适用问题。构成要件明确性原则乃是界定合宪性解释范畴的理论分析工具,只有那种应当符合构成要件明确性原则而规范却不明确的领域,才有合宪性解释的空间。合宪性解释作为一种价值论证活动,必须立足于宪法性法益,为解释结论之证力提供最充分的理由,以确保刑法解释的整全合法性。而比例原则则以其目的正当性、手段必要性和法益权衡性,处理公民自由与他人权利、公民自由与社会秩序、国家公权与公民权利等之间的利益关系,构成合宪性解释的规则性证成。As an important method of interpretation based on the consideration of legal order consistency, constitutional interpretation insists that the interpretation of criminal law should not go against the principle and spirit of constitution, thus revealing various problems in the application of the constitution in criminal practice. The principle of definiteness of constitu- tive requirements is a tool of theoretical analysis used to define the category of constitutional in- terpretation. It has a space for application only in areas in which indefinite norms exist and the principle of definiteness of constitutive requirements should be complied. As a value demonstra- tion activity, constitutional interpretation must be based on the legal interests of constitution and

关 键 词：比例原则 法秩序一致性 合宪性解释 构成要件明确性 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]