检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王金之[1] 李建彬[1] 戚焕鹏[2] 张英杰[1] 王玮[1] 马志芳[1] 丁昀[3] 尚东平[1]
机构地区:[1]山东省肿瘤医院放疗科,济南250117 [2]泰安市肿瘤防治院 [3]常州市第一人民医院
出 处:《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》2015年第2期116-120,共5页Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基 金:山东省科技发展计划项目(2011YD18039);山东省科技发展计划项目(2011YD18082)
摘 要:目的 探讨增强扫描与否对基于4DCT勾画的胸段食管癌原发肿瘤各时相GTV差异及对IGTV构建的影响.方法 25例胸段食管癌患者,胸上段8例、胸中段9例、胸下段8例,自由呼吸状态下序贯完成普通4DCT与增强4DCT扫描,同一勾画者按照同一标准先在平扫4DCT各图像上勾画GTV并构建相应IGTV.1个月后同一勾画者再在增强4DCT图像上勾画GTV并构建相应IGTV.结果 基于增强扫描图像勾画的靶区变异系数小于平扫图像勾画的(P=0.000),但胸上、下段食管癌患者二者的GTVz轴长度、GTV、IGTV均相近(P=0.529、0.110;P=0.158、0.416;P=0.147、0.615),而对胸中段食管癌患者二者的GTV z轴长度、GTV、IGTV不同(P=0.005、0.035、0.021).结论 对胸中段食管癌患者,增强4DCT扫描可减小靶区勾画误差并可构建相对精确的IGTV,而对胸上、下段食管癌患者靶区勾画及IGTV构建无显著影响.Objective To investigate the difference between conventional and contrast-enhanced four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans in delineating the gross tumor volume (GTV) in different phases and constructing the internal gross tumor volume (IGTV) in primary thoracic esophageal cancer.Methods Twenty-five patients with thoracic esophageal cancer,including 8 upper-thoracic,9 middle-thoracic,and 8 lower-thoracic,sequentially underwent conventional and contrast-enhanced 4DCT scans during normal breathing.The GTVs were delineated by a physician under the same standard using conventional plain 4DCT images,and the IGTVs were constructed accordingly.After one month,the GTVs were delineated by contrast-enhanced 4DCT images and IGTVs were constructed by the same physician.Results The coefficient of variation for the target volume based on the contrast-enhanced 4DCT images was smaller than that based on the plain 4DCT images.There were no significant differences in the length of the z axis of GTV,GTV,and IGTV between contrast-enhanced and plain 4DCT images in patients with upperand lower-thoracic esophageal cancer (P =0.529 and 0.110 ;P =0.158 and 0.416 ;P =0.147 and 0.615).However,in patients with middle-thoracic esophageal cancer,the length of the z axis of GTV,GTV,and IGTV were significantly different between contrast-enhanced and plain 4DCT images (P =0.005,0.035,and 0.021,respectively).Conclusions Contrast-enhanced 4DCT scan can reduce the error in delineating the target volume and construct a more accurate IGTV for patients with middle-thoracic esophageal cancer.However,it has no significant benefit in patients with upper-and lower-thoracic esophageal cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30