检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨理工大学管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150080 [2]哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
出 处:《中国科技论坛》2015年第4期11-16,29,共7页Forum on Science and Technology in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"全球价值链背景下我国装备制造业与生产性服务业融合机理及实现路径研究"(71373061);黑龙江省自然科学基金项目"东北地区装备制造业与生产性服务业融合机理与实现策略"(G201303);黑龙江省普通高等学校青年学术骨干支持计划项目"全球价值链视角下黑龙江省装备制造业与生产性服务业融合机理及融合政策研究"(1253G068)
摘 要:以产业研发投入结构为研究对象,从研发投入来源结构和使用结构两个方面对研发投入进行分析。结合研发产出分析,建立以研发效率为导向的产业研发投入-产出评价指标体系;构建改进的DEA模型,并基于中国装备制造业的截面数据和面板数据进行双维度实证研究。实证结果表明:改进的DEA模型具备较高的有效性;装备制造业的研发效率和研发资源配置结构随技术和管理水平的提升得以持续改善,但仍有较大提升空间。建议通过扩大研发资源总体投入规模和增强政府投入力度等策略提高中国装备制造业的研发效率,改善研发投入的来源结构和使用结构。By analyzing the structure of R&D investment from both sources-structure and using-structure perspectives, this paper builds up the input-output index system for evaluating the R&D efficiency and the ideal structure of R&D investment. Beside that, this paper constructs the improved DEA model and makes an empirical study based on both cross sectional and panel R&D data of equipment man- ufacturing industry in China. The result of the empirical study shows that, the R&D investment of Chinese equipment manufacturing in- dustry is obviously insufficient, and the structure of R&D investment is not reasonable. According to the empirical study result, this pa- per puts forward the ideal structure of R&D investment of Chinese equipment manufacturing industry for DEA efficient. At last, this pa- per gives the suggestions for promoting the R&D efficiency of equipment manufacturing industry, such as increasing the R&D investment scale and the government R&D investment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.239.69